Althouse was frightened by an encounter at the rally and she has video of what took place. This is my comment in her thread:
That is rude and creepy behavior for sure.
Makes me wish I had seen ya’ll in the crowd (and yeah, I was looking!) ’cause then not all your interactions with others at the rally would’ve been negative.
I can’t help but wonder tho…was all of her encounters with other people also this scary? Were all of the other signs she saw as nasty as the ones she posted pictures of? Having been at the rally myself I saw a lot of things she seems to have missed…those thoughts (and a few others) prompted this comment from me in her latest “open thread” post:
buy cialis line Apart from these, there are also some good medicines in the market that professes to solve these issues. Full-term newborn children likewise advantage viagra shops in india with expanded sharpness and social conduct, altogether less crying and lifted weight gain. Acid change in the bile is also dangerous. free levitra sample One in five men across the world cheapest viagra suffers from low sex drive and low premature ejaculation.
In one post Ann says that there is nothing wrong with crossing-over in a primary in order to vote for someone you think will weaken the other party’s chance of winning the general election, but in another she suggests that the mere act of having a recall election is akin to subverting democracy.
That doesn’t make much sense to me…can someone please explain how one person can hold both of those opinions?
Also, couldn’t help but notice that the reports from Ann&Meade about yesterday’s rally focused only on the few rude signs in the crowd and one boorish encounter, but they insist that they are “neutral” in their coverage of these events. Did nothing at all “positive” really happen to them? Was every sign they saw really as nasty as the 3-4 pictures they posted?